Skip to main content

Discussion over why Gurloes is embarrassed, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

"Gurloes shook his head. 'We have no say in the matter, Chatelaine. Nor do you. We carry out the sentences that are delivered to us, doing no more than we are told, and no less, and making no changes.' Embarrassed, he cleared his throat." (81)
What do you think Gurloes is embarrassed about in this scene?
Comments
lhaji Dada
Alhaji Dada That Gurloes is one of Vodalus' spy like Thechla. But also because you would expect Thecla to know this about the torturers.
 · Reply · 4d
ames Pepe
James Pepe Are they both spies?
 · Reply · 4d
lhaji Dada
Alhaji Dada Yes. Thecla is the in House Absolute. Gurloes is the spy within the citadel. Part of Severian/Thecla's animus for Gurloes (e.g. the charge that he is a coward/.hypocrite) stems from that.
 · Reply · 4d
ames Pepe
James Pepe You mean she is there when Sev is there?
 · Reply · 4d
lhaji Dada
Alhaji Dada Maybe you need to finish the books.
 · Reply · 4d
ames Pepe
James Pepe I've read BotNS multiple times. Urth only once.
 · Reply · 4d
ames Pepe
James Pepe If it is revealed that they are both spies I just don't remember it.
 · Reply · 4d
hilip Bonner
Philip Bonner It is not.
1

 · Reply · 4d
atrick McEvoy-Halston
 Write a reply...



unyi Dn
Sunyi Dn I assumed he was embarrassed that he could not help her the way she wished
4

 · Reply · 4d
ntónio Pedro Marques
António Pedro Marques Rather simplistically, to be speaking to an attractive woman in such a situation. But that's my original pedestrian reading.
1

 · Reply · 4d
asily Ingogly
Vasily Ingogly I took it as embarrassment at her asking for a choice.
1

 · Reply · 4d · Edited
ee Pretorius
Lee Pretorius You ask the good questions and make the good observations.
 · Reply · 4d
ames Pepe
James Pepe Haha thanks.
 · Reply · 4d
atrick McEvoy-Halston
 Write a reply...



ames Pepe
James Pepe I think there are at least three options and they need not be mutually exclusive. First, he is embarrassed because he has basically admitted that, even though he has achieved the highest rank in his chosen profession, he still has no real agency in thecarrying out of it, he is ultimately slavish. Second, he is embarrassed because he knows what hes saying isn't true and is embarrassed in spite of himself because he knows he is spouting bullshit just to tow the line. Third, it's a bit of dramatic irony because of what Sev is about to do.
5

 · Reply · 4d
ichael DeQuasisane
Michael DeQuasisane Sev mentions that Gurloes is very good, politically. I think he is not truly embarassed, but is using an embarassed tone to deflect potential argument.
“Maam, I’d really like to help you, I would. I really would. But the boss... well the boss makes the rules.”  
The feigned embarassment takes the focus off of the Guild and puts it onto the Autarch (whose mighty bones hold up all of the Urth).
1

 · Reply · 4d
teve Fridsma
Steve Fridsma Michael DeQuasisane that is how I've read it.
 · Reply · 3d
atrick McEvoy-Halston

Write a reply...





ames Pepe
James Pepe Yeah, he could be feigning a deferential tone. We know he has been employing little tricks like that to grease the entire interaction, talking to her about the various mechanisms in order to keep her mind (and, perhaps, his) off of what is about to happen. Maybe Sev is just reading it wrong and takes for embarrassment what is actually sadness, pity, or remorse for what he is going to have to do to her.
 · Reply · 4d · Edited
atrick McEvoy-Halston
Patrick McEvoy-Halston It is a very detached take on what he does that conflates every torturer as one and the same in regards to their "carrying out sentences," that most people would buy, but which he uses to in fact hide the fact, the qualifier, that sometimes there are in fact options... that sometimes there is wiggle-room -- and that he himself is on the look out for them and uses them whenever he can. The particular way he uses them in regards to a rape he is required to administer, makes him seem repugnant to Severian, for he is forced to use tools and drugs to make the "abuse" happen, despite his bulk and strength. Embarrassment might indicate he is temporarily made aware that he doesn't live up to the expectations every torturer ostensibly is committed to/represents: a common reliable standard.
 · Reply · 4d
atrick McEvoy-Halston
Patrick McEvoy-Halston He has also admitted that he doesn't "simply carry out sentences," like a stoic, like a robot, but that he can LIKE doing so... not neutral, rather, there are passions involved; one could potentially go about them eagerly, with relish -- he expects Severian... with his youth and all, would be eager to administer the abuse. When discussing an order to administer "abuse" to one of the clients, Gurloes admits to liking/prefering small women. In this discussion of administered rape, Severian too admits to sexual excitement (he is repulsed only by the consideration that Gurloes can't fulfill his duties without aids -- drugs and whatnot -- out of what appears to be fear, and maybe possibly concerns about his potency... he guesses Severian would be thinking this his central concern); he isn't at the point where he can sympathize with clients. There is some similarity here, perhaps, between the "stoic" torturers who just carry out their duties, doing no more than they are told, and no less, and the the leach at the end of Autarch, who also denatures everything he does with his "client" as on the level, as just neutral and innocuous, but which Severian gauges is in fact prurient: sadistic relish, knowing perversion, hidden through the dodge of commonplace assumptions. 
“The old man pinched his cheek. "He'll recover quickly—in time to warm my bed tonight. At his age they always do. Nay, it's not what you think. I only sleep beside him because the night-breath of the young acts as a restorative to those of my years. Youth, you see, is a disease, and we may hope to catch a mild case. How stands your wound?"
There was nothing—not even an admission, which might have been rooted in some perverse desire to maintain an appearance of potency
—that could have convinced me so completely as his denial.” 
Both Gurloes and the leach hide something they know is suspect about themselves, behind "truths" they know people have been trained to assume as unquestionably valid; which people feel the social pressure to agree as universally valid. For Gurloes, this might give rise to embarrassment -- at least some credit to him. As Severian says, he's a complex man -- both sides, kind of guy -- constantly requited to pretending he's more simple than he is. He is making that just-same presentation of himself to her, and maybe this too is part of the embarrassment.
 · Reply · 3d
atrick McEvoy-Halston

Write a reply...





avid McKinnis
David McKinnis We don't know that Gurloes is embarrassed. We only know what Severian perceived. The question should be why is Severian seeing embarrassment?
 · Reply · 4d
avid A Stockhoff
David A Stockhoff I think he knows Gurloes pretty well.
 · Reply · 3d
ames Pepe
James Pepe Or, perhaps, the question shouldn't even be why is Sev seeing embarrassment but why is Sev reporting embarrassment?
1

 · Reply · 3d
atrick McEvoy-Halston

Write a reply...





atrick McEvoy-Halston
Patrick McEvoy-Halston Another argument for saying he is embarrassed here because he himself routinely is on the lookout for exemptions-to-the-codified-rule, that more or less break the spirit of a thing but that he can justify; of him pretending to be a simple follower, someone who obeys, but actually being one to in fact take the lawyerly way out as frequently as opportunity allows: “By ancient custom, we must not use the steps (although I have seen Master Gurloes assist his vault to the scaffold with his sword, in the court before the Bell Tower)."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump

Too late -- WE SAW your boobs

I think we're mostly familiar with ceremonies where we do anointing. Certainly, if we can imagine a context where humiliation would prove most devastating it'd probably be at a ceremony where someone thought themselves due an honor -- "Carrie," "Good Fellas." "We labored long to adore you, only so to prime your hope, your exposure … and then rather than a ladder up we descended the slops, and hoped, being smitten, you'd judged yourself worthless protoplasm -- a nothing, for letting yourselves hope you might actually be something -- due to be chuted into Hades or Hell." Ostensibly, nothing of the sort occurred during Oscars 2013, where the host, Seth Macfarlane, did a number featuring all the gorgeous Oscar-winning actresses in attendance who sometime in their careers went topless, and pointed this out to them. And it didn't -- not quite. Macarlane would claim that all obscenity would be directed back at him, for being the geek so pathe