Skip to main content

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene?
Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity?
Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer).

Sawmonkey: Lucky boy
Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009)

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey
It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presumption and disregard on part of the girls, the movie decides to play it off mostly as some great score for the kid. My guess is that Crowe is conflicted about the incident. Packs of girls / women as friends but also vipers, is certainly something you notice in his films. The male protagonist who associates with them, who ardently defends / serves them, forcefully represents their interests to his male peers ("Joe. Joe. She's written 65 songs . . . 65. They're all about you"; "You guys, you're always talking about the fans, the fans, the fans; she was your biggest fan, and you threw her away!"), is made to seem possibly more evolved (the women certainly are in a hurry to deem him such) but also possibly someone who will never garner full respect from women -- someone, who in the end, is actually the one who making the mistake in not hanging out at the "Gas 'n' Sip on a Saturday night completely alone drinking beers with no women anywhere." Crowe seems someone who could well ask,"One question. Are you here because you need someone or because you need me?," but also someone who'd immediately retract, capitulate, owing to still being a bit afraid to stand up for himself and put his foot down.

Brian D: Wow
I believe some people need to re-read the premise for these "reviews." I think it had something to do with which movies were the most personally influential films, not perhaps the critical best.
The film had a similar affect on me personally, but I wouldn't say it was the best film of the past decade. And yes, there are some issues of gender politics in the movie, but name a film where there isn't. (Brian D. response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Almost Famous’”)

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @Brian D.
The premise behind this new Salon feature is to launch "salvos" and otherwise get a spirited conversation going. How does, "And yes, there are some issues of gender politics in the movie, but name a film where there isn't" draw us further into the film rather than school us on out? I was getting at something I felt fascinating and significant about Crowe, that hasn't been much remarked upon, and was hoping for expansion and engagement, not dismissal.

sawmonkey: You're right, in a way Patrick.
If gender issues had nothing to do with the scene it would be a horrific gang-rape. The social mores, being what they are, say the opposite to me. What 14 year old boy doesn't dream about being surounded by a sea of pussy? Some of Crowe's more self-serving moments don't hold up well (ie: this particular scene) but on the whole, he captures what it's like to be a kid living in his skin. The soundtrack ain't bad, either.

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey
Well said, sawmonkey.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

"Life" as political analogy, coming to you via Breitbart News

Immediately after seeing the film, I worked over whether or not the movie works as something the alt-right would produce to alienate us from the left. Mostly the film does work this way  -- as a sort of, de facto, Breitbart production -- I decided, though it's not entirely slam-dunk. There is no disparagement evident for the crew of the space station being a multicultural mix, for instance. Race is not invisible in the film; it feels conspicuous at times, like when the Japanese crew member is shown looking at his black wife on video conference; but the film maker, wherever he was actually raised, seems like someone who was a longtime habitat of a multicultural milieu, some place like London, and likes things that way. But the film cannot convince only as macabre relating to our current fascination with the possibility of life on Mars -- what it no doubt pretends to be doing -- because the idea of “threat” does not permeate this interest at all, whereas it absolutely saturates our …