Skip to main content

Abandoning pappy for our Ewya-mother

On becoming good boys and girls

The movie is about abandonment of a previous God -- the father, the patriarch -- in favor of a return to an older one -- the mother, the matriarch. The patriarch God IS something -- he's the colonel, who singly seems fit enough to take on half the forest. And he was useful, because his focus and force helped us beat back obligations, accounts-owing, and focus on our own lives -- IN our own lives. But while his might remained, that in shadow, well gained. Noticing Her, sensing and fearing her retribution, and feeling all alone, we've decided to abandon our protective pappy and rejoin our Eywa mother. As good boys and girls who are no longer sinning by using dad to abandon home and mother, we feel protected, righteous, and re-invigorated again. Our next move will be to attack those who pollute our together-world with alien thoughts, disturbing intricacies, unacceptable independence. That is, our next move is at least as likely to be against NYT-reading lefties as it is those who stink corporate, on the right. So, yes, corporate-cheering right, be wary. We are coming for you -- unless you learn to McMarch your arrogance on Earth's behalf. But so too, the David Brooks -- and likely even more -- the Paul Krugmans. Our nation can be made to seem our Eywa. Obama, the war-leader, on Her behalf. It's the way it's going to go -- can't you just feel it?

I find the conservative backlash simply hilarious considering their main information source - Fox News - called the film "pro-military." (Smart Moose, response to post, “Conservative backlash against ‘Avatar,’” Salon, 5 Jan. 2010)

@SmartMoose

It is certainly pro-warrior, and could easily be deemed pro-military. The problem in the film is not military, but a CORRUPTED military. It is military distorted, disfigured, through lack of righteous purpose. It is near evident in their physiogamy -- certainly in their unwashed, uncombed, snide-ful countenances. They're elves turned orcs.

Afghanistan is already something different than Iraq. It's not yet Green and save-the-earth -- it's not "blue-men," serving Eywa -- but it's not so much Blackwater either. Let's just say it's already better shaved, if not yet at the point where it's spun around to fire back at the grunts with the gun.

Link: Conservative backlash against “Avatar” (Andrew Leonard, Salon)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Watch out, liberal extremities!

Watch out, liberal extremities! websmith says: “White people and an increasing number of minorities are tired of being called racists by the true racists and more appalled that this loony bleeding has spread from the heart to the brain." This is what many progressives are going to have to get used to hearing -- that THEY are the true racists! I've said this before but '60's liberalism goes down when enough people have decided that, in sum, it was never truly about what minorities, impoverished people wanted/needed, but instead what certain AFFLUENT WHITE PEOPLE wanted to believe those they ostensibly spoke for wanted/needed. They (progressives) will be made to seem, not the most caring, but the most negligent, most truly self-serving. Of course, most democrats in power will not be too afflicted by this, because they're ready to turn on the ’60s too. Why? Because, sad to say, they're getting in mood to want to see the weak and needy set-up as punishment-worthy a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conversation about Agulis at the Gene Wolfe Facebook Appreciation Club

James Pepe New Member  ·  20 hrs I’ve been rereading BotNS (this is my second read of it) and I just finished the part where Sev fights Agulis with the avern. I’m interested to hear what people think of the accusations Agilus levels agains Sevarian. Agilus says Sev has wronged him three times. Are we meant to take these accusations seriously? They're very strange. Is this just a last ditch attempt by Agilus to get out of being killed, or is Sev actually guilty of something, either legal, moral, or cultural. Are the powers that Agilus refers to simply that the avern didn’t kill Sev when it wounded him? Here the quote, “First by entrapment. You carried an heirloom worth a villa about the city without knowing what it was you had. As owner it was your duty to know, and your ignorance threatens to cost me my life tomorrow unless you free me tonight. Secondly, by refusing to entertain any offer to buy. In our commercial society, one may set...
Post a Comment
Read more

Discussion of Short Sun, at the Facebook Gene Wolfe Appreciation site

Mike Bennewitz January 15 at 5:56 PM Some thoughts on the themes in Book of the Short Sun [Spoilers] I've just finished a re-read of Book of the Long Sun and Book of the Short Sun. Short Sun infected my mind more than Long Sun, I guess. I don't have as many questions about LS as I do about SS. Wolfe is very obsessed with doubled identity throughout Short Sun. It's woven into so many aspects of the book that unless there is a transubstantial meaning I'm missing, I'm going to have to take it as a big clue that the narrator's identity is doubled. You could be forgiven for not realizing that the narrator has two mind/spirits inhabiting his body throughout half of the series. While Wolfe obscures this a little bit, he's telling you nearly everywhere that things are doubled. • A Binary System of two planets • Two quills in the pen case • Neighbors are like doubled humans, 4 arms and 4 legs. • Animals of Blue are doubled. 8 legs, 2 trunks, 4 eyes...
Post a Comment
Read more