Skip to main content

Awakening-mother Ewya

@geometeer

Geometeer: "Perhaps the most wonderful thing in Avatar is that the hero when human has a hand-rolled wheelchair -- two-century-old tech at the story's date, in a tech-worshipping culture! -- just to have him seem more sad and pitiful."

The movie explained this with the reverence to how cheap the government was when it came to veterans' benefits. (Xrandadu Hutman, response to post, “What the news big can learn from ‘Avatar,’” Salon, 4 Jan. 2010)

Xrandadu:

It did that. But it also worked to set him up as sad and pitiful -- to the rest of the "core." The point is also made, in the way the other (let's call them) marines reacted to his disability, that they're now much more paid grunts (the fallen) than they are military men: military men may have teased him, but would have more readily appreciated his I-can-do-what-you-can-do attitude. That the colonel looks past this, baiting him with new legs but focussing entirely on his mental-makeup, makes him a bit apart from the rest of the rangy crew. That is, the colonel is never in the end the military man who went corporate soft, but an old-style patriarch -- the devil? -- whose formidableness can't match that of awakening Mother Ewya. In a way, the last fight is a replay of what we saw in Aliens -- with a mother and her colony against a lone, independent, let's-dance warrior (Signourney, in Aliens) -- but with a reversed outcome. Felt that way to me.

Right-wingers who complain about the film, see it as leftist, should note that Cameron takes extra care to make the military grunts seem like ill-groomed anarchists. That is, when people see them, they may as quickly think anarchist street-youth -- or even, disspoiled tree-huggers -- as they do military men. Got the Olympics coming to Vancouver, and the public seems in mind to imagine its leftie protestors as this kind of foul. The mountain-loving folk who just can't wait, can't imagine why anyone would want to spoil their outdoor, innocent, sporty fun.

Link: What the news biz can learn from “Avatar” (Andrew Leonard, Salon)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Watch out, liberal extremities!

Watch out, liberal extremities! websmith says: “White people and an increasing number of minorities are tired of being called racists by the true racists and more appalled that this loony bleeding has spread from the heart to the brain." This is what many progressives are going to have to get used to hearing -- that THEY are the true racists! I've said this before but '60's liberalism goes down when enough people have decided that, in sum, it was never truly about what minorities, impoverished people wanted/needed, but instead what certain AFFLUENT WHITE PEOPLE wanted to believe those they ostensibly spoke for wanted/needed. They (progressives) will be made to seem, not the most caring, but the most negligent, most truly self-serving. Of course, most democrats in power will not be too afflicted by this, because they're ready to turn on the ’60s too. Why? Because, sad to say, they're getting in mood to want to see the weak and needy set-up as punishment-worthy a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conversation about Agulis at the Gene Wolfe Facebook Appreciation Club

James Pepe New Member  ·  20 hrs I’ve been rereading BotNS (this is my second read of it) and I just finished the part where Sev fights Agulis with the avern. I’m interested to hear what people think of the accusations Agilus levels agains Sevarian. Agilus says Sev has wronged him three times. Are we meant to take these accusations seriously? They're very strange. Is this just a last ditch attempt by Agilus to get out of being killed, or is Sev actually guilty of something, either legal, moral, or cultural. Are the powers that Agilus refers to simply that the avern didn’t kill Sev when it wounded him? Here the quote, “First by entrapment. You carried an heirloom worth a villa about the city without knowing what it was you had. As owner it was your duty to know, and your ignorance threatens to cost me my life tomorrow unless you free me tonight. Secondly, by refusing to entertain any offer to buy. In our commercial society, one may set...
Post a Comment
Read more

Discussion of Short Sun, at the Facebook Gene Wolfe Appreciation site

Mike Bennewitz January 15 at 5:56 PM Some thoughts on the themes in Book of the Short Sun [Spoilers] I've just finished a re-read of Book of the Long Sun and Book of the Short Sun. Short Sun infected my mind more than Long Sun, I guess. I don't have as many questions about LS as I do about SS. Wolfe is very obsessed with doubled identity throughout Short Sun. It's woven into so many aspects of the book that unless there is a transubstantial meaning I'm missing, I'm going to have to take it as a big clue that the narrator's identity is doubled. You could be forgiven for not realizing that the narrator has two mind/spirits inhabiting his body throughout half of the series. While Wolfe obscures this a little bit, he's telling you nearly everywhere that things are doubled. • A Binary System of two planets • Two quills in the pen case • Neighbors are like doubled humans, 4 arms and 4 legs. • Animals of Blue are doubled. 8 legs, 2 trunks, 4 eyes...
Post a Comment
Read more