Skip to main content

2009 best of decade, movie list

My list

Wall-E

Beowulf

Rachel Getting Married

Wendy and Lucy

Step Brothers

Lord of the Rings

Nick and Norah's

Beautiful Mind

Observe and Report

Transformers

There Will Be Blood

Incredibles and Ratatouille struck me as films for editors, for they make those who shape and control the rangey (i.e., Buddy), the heroes. Wall-E was the film for artists, those who know it’s about aggressing and going outside the lines, even if it makes you a fool / child / Tom Cruise. (I saw the rat in Auto, and was glad to seem him get his comeuppance.) Personally, I think it's hard not to be super self-conscious/aware right now. I think this is just deadly for art, but great for self-management.

Lord of the Rings. I am simply astonished at how infrequently these magnificent films are mentioned. Honestly, I can't figure it out. Were they too popular? Too epic? Too faithful to the source material? Not faithful enough? Too lucrative? I simply don't understand it. A list of 25 films, and they're not there. I mean, c'mon now. (Douglas Moran, response to post, “Stephanie Zacherak on the best movies of the decade,” Salon, 29 Dec. 2009)

Excellent point, Douglas -- particularly apt in consideration of Stephanie's regret at movie makers / viewers without memory. My guess is that LOTR draws you out -- emotions on your sleeves, as it were. You retract afterwards, 'cause it's just no time to feel like you're a dodo, but also because Jackson IS intent on playing upon you -- he is manipulative, a bit sinister. Big fan, but I would be wary about joining his Fellowship: his films have me going a bit "Shakespeare in Love" after "Titanic" too.

Link: Stephanie Zacherak on the best movies of the decade (Salon)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...
3 comments
Read more

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...
2 comments
Read more