Skip to main content

Anti-semitism, with Quetzal, the fate of Blood, and inhumi?



Uh oh guys...
pastedGraphic.png




Like
Show more reactions
CommentShare
Comments
pastedGraphic_1.png
Weiss Lancaster
🤘😳🤘
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_2.png
Jordon Flato Abaia for Calde!!!!



6
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_3.png
Francis Repass Catachrest for Caldé

2
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_4.png

Write a reply...




pastedGraphic_5.png
David A Stockhoff Cthulhu comes. Praise him!
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_6.png
Nathan Carson After all, torturers use iron maidens.

1
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_7.png
Michael Tkach OUR TIME IS NOW!
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_4.png
Patrick McEvoy-Halston "Silk pretended to watch the parade as cavalry gave way to infantry, attractive young women who saluted the reviewing platform by holding their slug guns vertically at their left shoulders and marching with a stiff stride that reminded him of sibyls dancing at a sacrifice."

Sibyls dancing at a sacrifice...
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_4.png
Patrick McEvoy-Halston On a related note, did anyone worry that this passage by Quetzal would inspire anti-Semitic prejudice, or is it just too obvious in the text that Wolfe is antipathic to all prejudicial thinking, and in favouring intelligence, contestation, literacy, is, like the narrator of Peace, very pro-Jew? I ask because though Silk initially marks it so that the historical presumption that merchants, money-changers, are the most evil of people, is probably baseless, is gross populism, in the end he forgives all the rapists, murderers... criminals from the lower classes, lets them go free and renews their pride, but refuses the rich and proud "merchant," Blood, any forgiveness at all -- he's the root, and so not to given any quarter at all. That is, in effect he sustains the historical prejudice, which in our world, is anti-Semitic prejudice. 

Anyway, the quote: “Quetzal paused, exhaling with a slight hiss. "Now, my children, a most painful matter. Word has come to me that devils in human shape are seeking our destruction. Falsely and evilly. they promise money they have not got and will not pay, for our blood. Do not believe their lies. Their lies offend the gods. Anyone who slays good men for money is worse than a devil, and anyone who slays for money he will never see is a fool. Worse than a fool, a dupe." Oosik reached for the ear, but Quetzal shook his head.”

1
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d
pastedGraphic_8.png
Yorgos Nls I can not see it.

Regarding Peace, I have not reread it recently but the narrator never struck me as pro-Jew. And how you mean pro-jew exactly?
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d · Edited
pastedGraphic_9.png
Patrick McEvoy-Halston Yorgos Nls Wolfe is playing with something quite dangerous here, though. The whole concept of snake-men infiltrating a civilization to perhaps take it over, each one, tremendously sly and manipulative... and that prey on children? Dangerous, unless it's very clear that the stereotype is being employed to defuse it somehow... which arguably may mostly be the case. And, yes, in the same book series he does this he also employs stigma against proud money men like Blood, and excuses the abuses of the ostensibly more humble lower classes. 

Anyway, in "peace," two quotes: “They were supposed to be Jewish, but there was little about them to mark them as Jewish—no quick-witted, persuasive men; no curly-haired, clever, slant-eyed girls.”

“I undress, conscious that Sherry Gold is in the next cubicle, probably stripped to her bra and panties. She is a small girl, a little plump (“You seem to be putting on weight, Miss Gold. Strip to your bra and panties, please, and I’ll come in and weigh you”) pretty, a Jewish face—Jewish faces are not supposed to be pretty, but pretty anyway.”
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d · Edited
pastedGraphic_9.png
Patrick McEvoy-Halston I felt in "peace" an inclination to want to know and love Jews, to respect them, even if neighbours might be aghast at this. Personally I think most readers figure a Weer-Sherry Gold-type dynamic... an exotica, into our readings of "In Green's Jungles" and "Return to the Whorl."... Horn and the inhumi, particularly with Jahlee.
Manage

Like · Reply · 5d · Edited
pastedGraphic_9.png
Patrick McEvoy-Halston Yorgos Nls By the way, apparently Borski argued "Peace" as anti-Semitic... the portrayal of the Gold as of profound evil. Joan Gordon disagreed, and wrote about it here: https://lareviewofbooks.org/.../we-read-things-differently/

I'm not so focused on Peace but I am surprised that the discussion of Quetzal and the inhumi as Jewish apparently hasn't occurred. I might be wrong, but I went through some of the old Urth archives and haven't found anything, yet since at least since the Middle Ages, Jews were character-assassinated by the church, by prominent "enlightened" thinkers, by the common populace, as snakes, as vampires, that impersonate human beings, infiltrate society, and take on empowered positions there, and specifically preyed upon the young. Always of course associated with money and false promises as well. Personally, I hope this gets discussed, for Quetzal to many might seem a powerful hero of the text -- I certainly remember that HE was the one who ended child sacrifice -- even as we are meant to understand that we only see one side of him -- we're told by Potto that Quetzal is as malicious as they come... and we're meant to read it as a fair take -- and his whole split-off thing, where he is a powerful terror to young children. This profile of him... as someone who in daily life does a lot of good FOR the young -- i.e., ending child sacrifice -- but in personal life, remorselessly preys on them, fits the profile of the pedophile, even as they twin to the two to absolve themselves of guilt, not for the reason Quetzal does -- simple sanity and goodness.


In "Short Sun," it's also a simple fact that WE LIKE the inhumi that we meet, probably a lot. They seem the bridge to Horn's intellectual side, his perspicacious side, that no one else can meet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...