Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label dark knight

Rhetorical persuasion and true love (24 February 2009)

Rocket999: There's something about Dark Knight which leaves one thinking it's about getting the best from every particular scene rather than from the whole plot, which would seem to give real credence to your argument that there is little or no character development in the film. But there are many developments within conversations WITHIN these scenes, notably between Batman and the Joker, but with other characters as well, which has me thinking that the film, rather, is actually ALL ABOUT psychological movement and development. You experienced the movie as primarily about chasing, but the Joker isn't so much a dog chasing cars as he is the rhetoritician/politician/therapist set to make artful use of language and his subject's sensibilities, to draw them to see "just how pathetic they really are." He seeks to change people, and how, by appearances, such an outlandish, merciless, crazy, clown, set against the impossible, will actually manage (or come surpris...

On Dark Knight and Wall-E (22 February 2009)

Yeah, Dark Knight -- thanks for that. Dark Knight was an exploitive film, but it did bring back some of the 9/11 chill. Wall-E did something of the same, too, and perhaps for this reason they both struck me as vital. Neither so bleak, though. Both are as much romances as they are anything else: wall-e and the joker made good use of their barren (unpeopled, with the former; peopled but with boring, predictable people, with the latter) landscapes, but really come to life when the love of their lives comes into their lives (with both batman and eve being reserved, muscled, bad-asses, interestingly enough). The batman and joker romance as part of the Romance montage, then? I would like to have seen that. Would have shown the Oscars got the point. Link: Are the Oscars Recession-Proof (Salon)