Skip to main content

If only (James) Cameron wore a tutu

"[T]he lumbering, gentle Oher", "in a cautious and economical performance", "is the only one who automatically sits down at the table to eat, presumably out of simple good manners, but also out of some idea of what Thanksgiving should be, drawn less from his own experience than from Norman Rockwell's 'Freedom From Want.'" (Zacharek, "Oscars 2010: In defense of Sandra Bullock")

+

"'Crazy Heart' is exceptionally modest in both its ambitions and its scope." "[P]laying their characters' cautious affection [. . .]" "Gyllenhaal is an understated, guileless actress -- she always lets the role come to her instead of going after it with gusto. Her speaking manner is casual, and as an actress she's often soft-spoken in a way that hints at deep personal shyness." "a strange and slightly awkward sentence that doesn't even have the shelter and the protection of a song around it." (Zacharek, "Crazy Heart")

+

"The expressiveness of those unnaturally mobile eyebrows or the way, either in character or during the course of an on-camera interview, he almost seems to blush when he makes a self-deprecating joke, as if he were wary of calling too much attention to himself." "Just as his body has been trained and disciplined to sustain all sorts of physical abuse in the ring [. . .], so is Johnson, as an actor, fully willing to endure all kinds of humiliation, ribbing and teasing emasculation — and always with a smile."

"Strangely, and to his credit, he looks much more comfortable in a tutu than he does bragging about his athletic prowess or stature." (Zacharek, "Dwayne Johnson")

+

"In every movie, including this one, he's happy to stand by and let his co-stars do their stuff, without feeling the need to step in and grab our attention with clownish facial expressions or torrents of jibber-jabber à la Jim Carrey or Robin Williams. Ferrell is content to be low-key and goofy" (Zacharek, "Land of the Lost")

Versus:

'''Avatar' would be great fun, if only Cameron -- the picture's writer, director, producer and editor -- had a sense of humor about himself, which he clearly doesn't. Instead Cameron -- who is no longer just King of the World but Emperor of the Universe -- has to make it clear he's addressing grand themes." "'Avatar' is Cameron's 'Let's be fair to the Indians' movie." "Cameron is less a sage than a canny bonehead. Characters signal their motives and intentions with thundering dialogue, mouthed by the actors in ways that suggest the guy at the top has a tin ear, or at least some pretty strange ideas about punctuation." "Cameron takes all this 'We must be one with nature' business very seriously." (Zacharek, "Avatar")

Generosity should be lauded, and bullying self-assertiveness, taken down. But I for one sense in Stephanie an intention to make the side effects of being bullied -- most notably, the thereafter carefulness to please and charm but never offend -- praiseworthy, desirable; and the side effects of understanding the world as a place for wondrous, expansive self-assertion, as vain, intrinsically ungenerous, and wholly punishment-worthy.

Why, after knowing that "we're not supposed to call Johnson "The Rock" anymore -- [as] he has politely stated, in interview after interview, that that's his preference" -- did you title your article "Dwayne Johnson: He still rocks my world"? HE would never ask you anything of the sort, of course. Too blunt; too much risk of unsettling. But since one wonders if somewhere between all his amenableness he just must find some dispensable amongst his fandom to suffer for all his forever-pleasing and never really being listened to, one also suspects that he -- like Cera -- really now most needs to become more obtuse and bad-ass, if not Cameron-level oblivious and indifferent. For many of us he may thereby prove less likeable, but I suspect it'll help him come to like himself more -- which should be the point.

Let's not romance masochism, and vilify signs of (what is actually in greatest truth) healthy self-esteem.

Link: Oscars 2010: In defense of Sandra Bullock (Salon)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...