Skip to main content

Recent Facebook postings concerning the Trump victory

4 hrs ·

Lots of talk now about how more than half of voting Americans voted for someone other than Trump. There's anticipation that they might yet sideline this guy, trip him up. But we liberals are only getting a small taste now of the number of Americans that will be abandoning us. It's going to grow and grow, as Trump successfully creates his version of America as a land of newly purified folk, who've recommitted themselves to a country they'd forsaken, that'll include a vast number of people who aren't white. If we're committed now to being wiser so we aren't surprised by future developments, we might remember how surprised we were just recently that so many of our friends whom we thought were feminists revealed themselves, in their obscene hatred of Hillary, as greatly misogynistic Bernie Bros, and shouldn't assume that this phenomena of corruption within what we thought was a heart of god has been staunched. We might remember that SNL skit which showed that many more Americans than just Trump supporters are committed to the idea that Americans ought to be God-fearing and humble, and remain ever-conscious of incongruent these traits are with the progressive goal of individualism and full self-empowerment/self-actualization. For many people, this is way too much self-attending to not be Satan's cause. We are "bad" and were meant to suffer.

I think he'll present a 1950s' version, but that repairs a lot of the damage against black americans (his vision of "bad immigrants" means those brought in 1960s on, through Ted Kennedy's -- that is, through "liberals'", through our -- efforts). The border gate will come up quick, and you'll find some members of the press will even say it actually isn't so bad an idea. He'll start some national work programs, and you'll find some members of the press start saying that "that Trump... he's actually not so bad a guy after all; we just needed to give a chance!" He'll junk Obamacare but surprisingly replace it with something even more substantial for the working class Americans out there that have begun to worship him. And some time after that, when his number of friends has expanded into communities you thought we're guaranteed committed against him (God, national pride, Americans as creatures of sin who've finally begun to redeem themselves through accepting of life as a burden... I wonder how many people who aren't white that'll draw in?) -- he'll start talking about how what we need to now is to eliminate from the country all the vermin that had corrupted it. "Spoiled" university students will be attacked, as will professors who ostensibly have focused mostly on teaching future leaders to hate what is best about the American way of life. Many liberal professors who've viewed what's happening in the universities with irritated anger will say, "well, I still have problems with Trump but these spoiled shits surely had it coming, with all their ridiculous insistences and complaining that only got in the way of their actually learning something... who the fuck did they think they were, anyway -- our bosses?!!" and we'll have lost another wall of people we thought were surely with us. They subscribed to the New Yorker for heaven's sakes. How could we possibly lose them?
The way Fascism goes, is first national "fusion," which draws in gargantuan numbers, including many who you thought were committed to a progressive vision, then the fracture. Civilization has simply tilted too far from what people's corrupt childhoods allowed them.
- - - - -

If you think Trump's America is only going to appeal to white Americans you'll probably have to do a re-think. That potential unity between white and black Americans that the Black Jeopardy SNL skit suggested, will prove real, as Trump begins his initial objective: not just policies, but creating a spiritually fused nation (Hitler's first goal was national fusion, not an all out war on Jews). You're on the out, not based on your colour -- I think his vision will be inclusive to black and white, though no other colour included -- but by the fact that no part of you wants to drift back into imagining the country you were born in as some kind of spiritual homeland: if you're internationalist, globalist, progressive, atheist, to the core.

I think we need to get used to being just small mammals in the age of dinosaurs returned, knowing that no matter how daunting and impressive their unexpected resurgence, no matter how alarmed we are to see so many of our previously evolving kin start to grow back reptilian fins and whatnot, historically their time of reign is still limited. I think we're going to need to prove adept at waiting things out. Show our foresight and impulse-control, not rush to see what the courts will make of Trump's plans, because they won't be able to do shit. Hillary and Trump got similar numbers, but Trumpism will grow and grow.
- - - - -

Americans were beginning to feel too independent, and parentally abandoned for it, so they regressed (I'm a Freudian) back to the freedom-curtailed 1950s. The people who have most to fear: the people "mommy" hates because they abandoned her for their own spoiled, self-serving self-actualization -- i.e. progressives.

If America had been giving guaranteed annual incomes and a life of prosperity to everyone dispossessed by trade deals, this still would have happened. It's not the money troubles, the Depression, it's what James F. Masterson calls "growth panic" -- a flight from freedom. Psychoanalytic exploration of this phenomena can be found at Lloyd DeMause's website,


Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   

2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…