Skip to main content

Recent Facebook postings concerning the Trump victory

4 hrs ·

Lots of talk now about how more than half of voting Americans voted for someone other than Trump. There's anticipation that they might yet sideline this guy, trip him up. But we liberals are only getting a small taste now of the number of Americans that will be abandoning us. It's going to grow and grow, as Trump successfully creates his version of America as a land of newly purified folk, who've recommitted themselves to a country they'd forsaken, that'll include a vast number of people who aren't white. If we're committed now to being wiser so we aren't surprised by future developments, we might remember how surprised we were just recently that so many of our friends whom we thought were feminists revealed themselves, in their obscene hatred of Hillary, as greatly misogynistic Bernie Bros, and shouldn't assume that this phenomena of corruption within what we thought was a heart of god has been staunched. We might remember that SNL skit which showed that many more Americans than just Trump supporters are committed to the idea that Americans ought to be God-fearing and humble, and remain ever-conscious of incongruent these traits are with the progressive goal of individualism and full self-empowerment/self-actualization. For many people, this is way too much self-attending to not be Satan's cause. We are "bad" and were meant to suffer.

I think he'll present a 1950s' version, but that repairs a lot of the damage against black americans (his vision of "bad immigrants" means those brought in 1960s on, through Ted Kennedy's -- that is, through "liberals'", through our -- efforts). The border gate will come up quick, and you'll find some members of the press will even say it actually isn't so bad an idea. He'll start some national work programs, and you'll find some members of the press start saying that "that Trump... he's actually not so bad a guy after all; we just needed to give a chance!" He'll junk Obamacare but surprisingly replace it with something even more substantial for the working class Americans out there that have begun to worship him. And some time after that, when his number of friends has expanded into communities you thought we're guaranteed committed against him (God, national pride, Americans as creatures of sin who've finally begun to redeem themselves through accepting of life as a burden... I wonder how many people who aren't white that'll draw in?) -- he'll start talking about how what we need to now is to eliminate from the country all the vermin that had corrupted it. "Spoiled" university students will be attacked, as will professors who ostensibly have focused mostly on teaching future leaders to hate what is best about the American way of life. Many liberal professors who've viewed what's happening in the universities with irritated anger will say, "well, I still have problems with Trump but these spoiled shits surely had it coming, with all their ridiculous insistences and complaining that only got in the way of their actually learning something... who the fuck did they think they were, anyway -- our bosses?!!" and we'll have lost another wall of people we thought were surely with us. They subscribed to the New Yorker for heaven's sakes. How could we possibly lose them?
The way Fascism goes, is first national "fusion," which draws in gargantuan numbers, including many who you thought were committed to a progressive vision, then the fracture. Civilization has simply tilted too far from what people's corrupt childhoods allowed them.
- - - - -


If you think Trump's America is only going to appeal to white Americans you'll probably have to do a re-think. That potential unity between white and black Americans that the Black Jeopardy SNL skit suggested, will prove real, as Trump begins his initial objective: not just policies, but creating a spiritually fused nation (Hitler's first goal was national fusion, not an all out war on Jews). You're on the out, not based on your colour -- I think his vision will be inclusive to black and white, though no other colour included -- but by the fact that no part of you wants to drift back into imagining the country you were born in as some kind of spiritual homeland: if you're internationalist, globalist, progressive, atheist, to the core.

I think we need to get used to being just small mammals in the age of dinosaurs returned, knowing that no matter how daunting and impressive their unexpected resurgence, no matter how alarmed we are to see so many of our previously evolving kin start to grow back reptilian fins and whatnot, historically their time of reign is still limited. I think we're going to need to prove adept at waiting things out. Show our foresight and impulse-control, not rush to see what the courts will make of Trump's plans, because they won't be able to do shit. Hillary and Trump got similar numbers, but Trumpism will grow and grow.
- - - - -


Americans were beginning to feel too independent, and parentally abandoned for it, so they regressed (I'm a Freudian) back to the freedom-curtailed 1950s. The people who have most to fear: the people "mommy" hates because they abandoned her for their own spoiled, self-serving self-actualization -- i.e. progressives.

If America had been giving guaranteed annual incomes and a life of prosperity to everyone dispossessed by trade deals, this still would have happened. It's not the money troubles, the Depression, it's what James F. Masterson calls "growth panic" -- a flight from freedom. Psychoanalytic exploration of this phenomena can be found at Lloyd DeMause's website, psychohistory.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...