Skip to main content

Discussion on "Miss Sloane," at the New Yorker Movie Facebook Club


Bilkish Vahed
"Miss Sloane" is a long, emotionally brutal film that I had to steel myself to stay with. It was the remarkable performance of Jessica Chastain that held me, made me want to know the full unravelling of this woman, Elizabeth Sloane. 

At the end though, I felt hollow. I was still reaching for a missing piece - what is the backstory of this character, I kept wondering?

That Sloane was driven by a singular will to win, that she ruthlessly arranged the details of her life to keep her top of her game, I saw. Yet still I felt cheated of a crucial element of a back story that could credibly explain the psychology of this character. Did I miss something?

Yung Ahn I watched that the other day and wished for the same. Big reveal

Richard Brody I agree that, contrary to some critics, backstory is usually a great improvement to a movie--the use of it is one of the advances in recent films--and the lack of it is an all-too-rare failing. Of course, there are exceptions; symbols and ideas can do the same thing; but that's a matter of higher artistry, not just thoughtful planning.

Olivier Tytgat True, though it's probably one of the hardest things to pull off without making it seem tacked on or forced, in which case I'd rather have a character of which you can only guess at their backstory instead of it being fed to me through clunky exposition.

Patrick McEvoy-Halston Sloane was the smartest person in the room; an inspiration to everyone young and liberal; does whatever has to be done, not only without flinching, but with expansive imagination; fiercely uses even friends if they're best use is as props of her own rather than themselves, independent agents (not quite ruthless or smart enough... hindered, hampered... limited); is kind and empathic towards members of the servicing class, even as she enjoys the privilege of her dominion over them. She is... Hillary Clinton? Debbie Wasserman Schultz? What everyone, previously, wanted to be?... Do we need backstory? She is emblematic of what it is to be alive to the world, circa 2016, but not, RIP. Her point isn't to have a past... it is to be the garb we all just previously wanted to slip into.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...