Skip to main content

Discussion on Richard Brody's review of "Atomic Blonde," at the New Yorker Movie Facebook Club

The New Yorker shared a link.
16 hrs
Richard Brody wrote this about "Atomic Blonde": It is a movie that has it both ways; it shows how the sausage of freedom is made, with gory battles behind the façades of public life—but it turns that gory combat into a new façade, another illusion that hides still others that are far more complex, troubling, and unresolved.
Have you seen it yet? What did you think? Let us know in the comments below. Let's keep the discussion about this film on this thread.

Empty East-Versus-West Espionage in “Atomic Blonde”
The new movie, starring Charlize Theron, uses the last days of the Berlin Wall as the backdrop for an utterly insubstantial and unengaging spy action-drama.
NEWYORKER.COM

- - - - -
Patrick McEvoy-Halston If the movie appeals to people who themselves find bliss in not-knowing, it's quite the criticism of everyone who liked it. Mind you, a mass of brilliant minds -- all ivy-league educated, mind you -- worked Hillary's campaign, doing their Miss Sloane thing, and in the end they looked they graphed their own action movie, "war room" narrative onto a landscape... that turned out NOT of their own making--whoops! we probably should have wanted to look!... like REALLY wanted to look! So there's plenty of flattering company to be had in this disposed state of blissful ignorance. But it's been successful for awhile -- isn't that what globalization is about? Starbucks, McDonalds, here, there, and everywhere, with the fact of not really knowing the "natives," having maybe all that much interest in them, an asset at the time?  

There's lots of ideas, here. Background changes types into people. Conflict in the East MAY NOT be about fundamentally decent people forced to do terrible things to fight evil. Fun as perhaps always fundamentally suspect... or at least an absolute beggar before the ecstatically anguished. Background meetings to plan things are often of more interest than depiction of the results. Placing "Stalker" within a film means it won't matter one toot how much style and transgression you applied to your heroine, the only thought specifically on your toil will be limited to her aftermath bruises...



Moira Brigitte Rauch Patrick you did put some thought into this 

Patrick McEvoy-Halston I wouldn't want to be trivial...

Moira Brigitte Rauch There is always room for a smart guy in this blog. 

Patrick McEvoy-Halston Very nice. Thank you. There really is so much going on in almost every Brody post, it's nice to have the New Yorker encourage our parsing things... stop. there was a lot there. let's go back one more time before we go on.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...
3 comments
Read more

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...
2 comments
Read more