Skip to main content

Self-sacrifice to appease, and prevent a re-visit, in Aronofsky's "Mother!"




Tal Abbady, in an interesting comment in the thread discussing Richard Brody's review of "Mother!," guesses (she hadn't seen the film) that Michelle Pfeiffer was probably squandered in this film, yet in reality (SPOILERS AHEAD) the first half of the movie really could have had the title seem mostly about Pfeiffer, and her terrible incremental invasion... and thus a clear twin to "Black Swan," though its inverse, in that it's the mother who makes herself queen of the show, relegating the young woman from front and centre to background. Then she's gone, with really just hooligans and a PR lady and an idiot priest after her thereafter--a mistake for the Devil, as it recovers the movie a bit for Lawrence: these lot are ample in numbers, but without perspicacity, without cunning, and an eventual escape from them can be imagined once she's built up enough fury, with "Mother!" being then clearly about her as pressed upon young nature goddess, doomed to whither, but with one last gasp of vengeful destruction within her. "Mephistopheles" appears to do the principle damage, leaving her demon horde to do the mopping up... is how the movie as is might feel like, in how the movie transitions from weight in personality and individual formidableness to simple weight in numbers.

Could you imagine if the movie had ended with suddenly Pfeiffer reappearing and taking the gift Lawerence offered her husband, snatching it out of her hand, and saying, "no dear... I'm the one who orchestrated this moment for your husband, and I'll present this gift, AS I'M DUE," with Lawrence having nothing to do but let her last few bit of healthy flesh relapse to become as dead as the ash the rest of her had become? The movie would finish with Pfeiffer's last words as a horrible chastising chortle, "No, in fact I am the queen, I am the queen, you miserable scene-stealing c**t of a daughter," and we'd see her image fluctuate with that of Hershey, and back, to Hershey, and back, to Hershey, and back... sort of the finish Aronofsky clearly pulled back from (to save the audience, and himself) in "Black Swan," to offer us instead the mother rather implausibly agreeably accepting her displacement and earnestly cheering her daughter on as she performs.

Youth might have its moment, but in the end, "Mother!"/Mephistopheles will pay you back for every bit of tribute you stole from her. You'll never be allowed to forget your slighting... Mother. Fin.

Anyone else finish their watching the movie thinking something odd about the whole second half of the movie featuring a surplus of armageddon, but the absence of a single, truly scary, predator? Is the second half done in appeasement, a supply, to her, the scary mother, the one worthy of an exclamation mark, so that in the end she doesn't revisit? Is that the "victory" of the film? That so much carnage is thrown to placate her that in the end she's so much in the distance it becomes difficult to excavate exactly whom "Mother!" is referring to specifically?... it's really the sheepish ingenue? Really!? Certainly points there, but after being pushed about and half-raped, and her giving the last scrap of herself to her resurgent husband, that can't be right: the exclamation mark is way too insufficiently limp.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch out, liberal extremities!

Watch out, liberal extremities! websmith says: “White people and an increasing number of minorities are tired of being called racists by the true racists and more appalled that this loony bleeding has spread from the heart to the brain." This is what many progressives are going to have to get used to hearing -- that THEY are the true racists! I've said this before but '60's liberalism goes down when enough people have decided that, in sum, it was never truly about what minorities, impoverished people wanted/needed, but instead what certain AFFLUENT WHITE PEOPLE wanted to believe those they ostensibly spoke for wanted/needed. They (progressives) will be made to seem, not the most caring, but the most negligent, most truly self-serving. Of course, most democrats in power will not be too afflicted by this, because they're ready to turn on the ’60s too. Why? Because, sad to say, they're getting in mood to want to see the weak and needy set-up as punishment-worthy a...

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...