Skip to main content

Turning away from disease-theory

Six months later, I'm still mad at her for leaving. But I hope that near the end she found a kind of peace, the peace you feel when you stop struggling against the tide and just let it carry you out. That's what I would feel if she'd had any other fatal illness, because I know that's really what she had. Not all suicides are depression-related, of course. And not all depressed people kill themselves -- fortunately, many can, with therapy or medication or both, control it. But Ali died of the same thing that's eating away at approximately 21 million Americans right now, the thing that killed Alexander McQueen and Andrew Koenig and now Michael Blosil. They didn't take their lives because they were selfish. They did it because they succumbed to a selfish disease – one that wanted them all to itself. (Mary Elizabeth Williams, “Depression’s Latest Victim: Marie Osmond’s son,” 1 March 2010)

The disease model of depression has outlived its usefulness and yet we persist. We persist in avoiding responsibility for our habits of thought and our habits of relating. We persist in avoiding responsibility for the alienation our culture breeds by making depression a "disease" of the brain, somehow disconnected from the personalities and personal histories of the individual sufferers. The real killer in depression is person who turns his hand against himself. Emotions are not external agents, the demons of animistic cultures. Neither are they the unpredictable byproduct of brain disease or chemical imbalance. Emotions come from thoughts. Emotions are an integral part of being human, inseparable from relationship to self, to family, and to the larger community. (srquist, response to post, “Depression’s Latest Victim”)

@Sara Rosenquist

I think you mean to use words like "choice" and "responsibility" to provoke people out of willfully "succumbing [to the lure of being victim] to a selfish disease" -- the retreat to science-legitimated, no-further-thought required. I think your shock is helpful, especially when Mary makes suicide after depression a Sunday to enjoy after a six-day work-week ("But I hope that near the end she found a kind of peace, the peace you feel when you stop struggling against the tide and just let it carry you out"), means of imagining yourself bidden toward a likely afterlife of lyrical ease and loving recompense ("They didn't take their lives because they were selfish. They did it because they succumbed to a selfish disease – one that wanted them all to itself.")

Still, if turning away from disease-theory means a movement toward blaming others -- which is what most people will think of when we associate suicide with choice -- it'll be regression, not progress. In truth, I don't believe depression is a disease, but I do think it is an affliction WHICH CAN determine a person's behavior and "choices." Early childhood, if you did not know sufficient love, if you came to understand your own needs as selfish and your role as someone who pleases others (your parents), your adult, independent life will be largely under the rule of an angry, watchful superego, which will ensure that you are much more prone to make some choices than you are others.

Link: Depression's latest victim: Marie Osmond's son

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...