Skip to main content

... but for the warning of my heart

We all know how Frodo would have trusted Boromir "but for the warning of his heart." But did you know that the elf-king Elrond was against sending Merry and Pippen along as members of the Fellowship, owing to the warnings of HIS heart? It's true... and Gandalf essentially told him HIS heart, the great elf-king's heart, spoke falsely, arguing for their inclusion with the weak argument that since you can't send a battalion into Mordor for it being sure to be noticed, you shouldn't think of military might at all when forming the Fellowship, and instead count on already established friendship. Yeah, 'cause it is SO apparent that not having another elf who can shoot down dragons or another human warrior who can take down dozens of orcs before going down, is but nothing if you've got a bit more of the accustomed and the familiar within your party -- 'cause who are kidding? friendship is born out of nothing again and again through their journeys.


Popular posts from this blog

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …