Skip to main content

Hunger Games (film) -- Review


Katniss's district is shown as so drained of vitality, she, Gale, and Peeta come across as Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli did when they first entered the no-more-cheer-than-a-graveyard domain of the subjected Horse Lords.  The result is that the Reaping looks like just as good an opportunity to actually save oneself as Gale's proposal to flee into the forest does:  the Opponent is becoming as weak and drained as all the adults have become.  This is true for all the kids actually reaped -- excepting the ones killed off in the first few minutes, dull as dishwater, excepting the frizzy-haired boy, who might in some alternate universe had a one-in-a-million chance to jump-start into a Sideshow Bob.  Gale is a stag; Katniss, your alert, quick deer; and Peeta the one a sophisticate would assess as so multi-capable his great flaw is that, owing to his mother's apparently catastrophic denial of him, though he can with facility heft hundred-pound bags he isn't anywhere near knowing the extent of his reach.  Rue is supposed to remind Katniss of Prim -- but this is crazy talk:  she is further proof that the Reaping took Katniss away from country debilitation toward being amongst "Princeton's" shining elite -- these type have got it so going on they even know what it is to loosen themselves to impish play.  
The favored district is composed of non-blanched meanies; but upon watching the film I realized the experience of their involvement with Rue, Thresh, Peeta and Katniss is kinda like the popular high school set figuring out exactly how best to deal with spark-possessing new varietals that one day might compose a competing rival one:  even while conniving how to dispose of them, pick them off, one by one, they're experimenting with and enabling the mental/physical/spatial relocations that could let them acceptably fit them in as their own.  This is a bit of a stretch, I know, but it is still the close high school equivalent.
It's the crowds that stand apart.  It may be that in their united fealty to Katniss, District 12 figures in the imagination as pure, while the Capital is set as a grotesque -- but I am pausing on this one.  If so, however, the film does enable a certain class of people for ruthless, empathy-denied elimination -- the Capital's crowds of splendor-entranced, disconcerned entitled elitists; and for this then should the film principally be explored for its say on fascism.  
* * * * *
Jake's comment at Movieline.com:   
[. . .] Consequently, I found the arrogant "bad boy" teen leading the group of evil teens to be far more interesting a character with his simple moment in the finale when he suggested that all the killing he did was not worth it.  That moment of regret showed more depth than katniss, Peeta, Rue (sp?) and all the other characters combined.
My reply:
Cato's final moment wasn't for me so much the character regretting as the film archly regrouping to argue the contest as simply an evil thing, rather than as a glorious opportunity for come-uppance on the arrogant popular kids (with denouement looking to involve wizened commentary on the sure fall of the arrogant).  I believe, though, that Cato spent his last moments sniffling something Peetaish -- that special Miss Katniss was of course the one in the end who was going to prove victorious.  I preferred the book where he was kept such an arrogant, powerful brute, Katniss wasn't sure he couldn't even have made his way through all the dogs (which were, by the way, way too inflated in the film -- Conan, let alone Cato, would find himself evenly matched if pit against one).  I will cooperate and acknowledge there is a way in which Cato's sniffling seems in character -- or, rather, at least in archetype:  he might be Hubris recognizing that Selflessness is what in the end is armor-clad by God.  Cato's group did seem as if versions of the fallen out of Paradise Lost or Pilgrim's Progress -- or perhaps better, out of Greek myths -- with each ordained an appropriate fall for claiming glories belonging solely to the gods:  Glamored-up becomes hideous; tall-as-a-tree is shot through at the trunk; furious dexterity is humbled by unabashed strength; Hercules-proud and strong, crushed by a pride of much stronger lion-dogs.  It's enough there, I think, to make Katniss and Artemis comparisons at all worth our bringing up. 

Comments

  1. I wish I could say what I liked about the film so much, but it really isn't clear to me. In many ways, it was inflated - as with the dogs - but I liked the film so much I feel I should read the book, rather a reversal on my part.

    In the end, I suppose, I must fall back on the cliche of "it made me think". Still, that is worth exploring, maybe...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Old Youth

You write about how poverty breeds creativity. You think about how scavenging for wild food gives you the perfect opportunity to slow down, to really appreciate your surroundings. You talk about how frugality is more environmentally sustainable. You pontificate on why creating meals from scratch is cheaper, healthier and deeply satisfying. Then you run out of cooking oil.You love fat. As a child you ate margarine by the spoonful. You didn't know any better. Now you've moved on to more delicious pastures. As a cook you can never resist sneaking in that extra bit of butter, that tablespoonful of olive oil, that dab of bacon grease. You believe that cake is a vessel for frosting, that salad dressing should be two parts oil to one part vinegar, and that packaged low-fat foods are a symptom of the decline of Western civilization. Fat makes food taste good.Under the best of circumstances, you have eight or nine varieties of fat on hand. In ascending order of importance: chicken drip…

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

True Detective cont'd

Recently, Rachel Syme wrote this
As the dust settles on the “True Detective” finale, and the adventures of Rust Cohle and Marty Hart fade into the television firmament like the distant stars they found so meaningful, at least one thing is clear: it didn’t quite end the way we wanted it to. There is no doubt that the writer, Nic Pizzolatto, and director, Cary Fukunaga, pulled off a midseason coup, giving us a show in the January doldrums that caused temporary mass insanity. Like one of Rust’s intoxicating philosophical koans about sentient meat, “True Detective” cast a kind of spell over its viewers, convincing them that no matter what it was they were watching it was at the very least something worth the hours of debating, clicking, parsing, and comment-section feuding. Moreover, the gorgeous cinematography depicting Louisiana in the gloaming, the delectable short-anthology format, and the movie-star bona fides made us believe that we were watching something novelistic, even approachi…