Skip to main content

The Avengers -- Review

Note:  this review builds on Stephanie Zachareks' review of the movie at movieline.com
Not to say Loki doesn't have presence, but the story proved to be about the team settling together in a very satisfying fashion, with everything else but interjections to this realization.  
Personally, the agent getting tongue-tied before an American legend, perhaps because it was presaged by his being highlighted, playfully, certainly not sincerely, but still a bit oddly as a romantic rival to Stark, kind of felt like he was being set up for something -- the overreaching kid, due a sad fate for being likened to things he'll never be -- a manly hero; a playboy -- and for never being able to subsequently quite pull himself tightly together again thereafter.  But you let that momentary consideration dissolve because its purpose of helping limit the sense of Captain America as anachronistic, now irrelevant -- a joke -- that nobody too much wants while we're all becoming entranced to bond with Eastwood, old American virtues, locales and industry, is effectively lessened here.  Anyhow, the moment felt too functional and too much like it was spotting one guy out to be affecting.  To me, the moments that worked best were when the heroes have had their fair estimation of one another and have begun to settle in.  Thor standing alone quietly with Hulk for the first time as mates -- which, other than Hulk's Indiana Jones-like trouncing of the gloating, over-estimating opponent, might be the film's most satisfying moment -- worked for this reason first, and then secondly for the terrific follow-up humor it spawned.
I'm not sure Black Widow's best moment was the one you mentioned.  I was more struck with her encounter with Loki, another plausible instance where something human -- there's just no denying it! -- could catch short even the likes of "magic and gods"; and so much more satisfying than when an F-18 or a nuke are used to do the same.  It was a terrific surprise; Loki blanched and guffawed, as we did.  And we were pleased that Whedon didn't let a talent she'd after all shown she had simply surrender itself because before someone ostensibly way out of her countenancing; and I thought good for you Whedon for giving something pronounced to the more simply human characters -- with Captain America of course getting undaunted leadership, as well as emblemmanship of the times -- to help settle them in experientially amongst their powerhouse teammates as legitimate peers.  Hawkeye didn't get a standout trait; but they did make his arrows something sorta akin to Iron Man's arsenal.  And with him more or less the one exception, and with him being played by a movie star actor, and with us wanting one or two of the Avengers to be allowed to sulk a bit in the shadows -- good enough.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

"Life" as political analogy, coming to you via Breitbart News

Immediately after seeing the film, I worked over whether or not the movie works as something the alt-right would produce to alienate us from the left. Mostly the film does work this way  -- as a sort of, de facto, Breitbart production -- I decided, though it's not entirely slam-dunk. There is no disparagement evident for the crew of the space station being a multicultural mix, for instance. Race is not invisible in the film; it feels conspicuous at times, like when the Japanese crew member is shown looking at his black wife on video conference; but the film maker, wherever he was actually raised, seems like someone who was a longtime habitat of a multicultural milieu, some place like London, and likes things that way. But the film cannot convince only as macabre relating to our current fascination with the possibility of life on Mars -- what it no doubt pretends to be doing -- because the idea of “threat” does not permeate this interest at all, whereas it absolutely saturates our …