Skip to main content

The Avengers -- Review

Note:  this review builds on Stephanie Zachareks' review of the movie at movieline.com
Not to say Loki doesn't have presence, but the story proved to be about the team settling together in a very satisfying fashion, with everything else but interjections to this realization.  
Personally, the agent getting tongue-tied before an American legend, perhaps because it was presaged by his being highlighted, playfully, certainly not sincerely, but still a bit oddly as a romantic rival to Stark, kind of felt like he was being set up for something -- the overreaching kid, due a sad fate for being likened to things he'll never be -- a manly hero; a playboy -- and for never being able to subsequently quite pull himself tightly together again thereafter.  But you let that momentary consideration dissolve because its purpose of helping limit the sense of Captain America as anachronistic, now irrelevant -- a joke -- that nobody too much wants while we're all becoming entranced to bond with Eastwood, old American virtues, locales and industry, is effectively lessened here.  Anyhow, the moment felt too functional and too much like it was spotting one guy out to be affecting.  To me, the moments that worked best were when the heroes have had their fair estimation of one another and have begun to settle in.  Thor standing alone quietly with Hulk for the first time as mates -- which, other than Hulk's Indiana Jones-like trouncing of the gloating, over-estimating opponent, might be the film's most satisfying moment -- worked for this reason first, and then secondly for the terrific follow-up humor it spawned.
I'm not sure Black Widow's best moment was the one you mentioned.  I was more struck with her encounter with Loki, another plausible instance where something human -- there's just no denying it! -- could catch short even the likes of "magic and gods"; and so much more satisfying than when an F-18 or a nuke are used to do the same.  It was a terrific surprise; Loki blanched and guffawed, as we did.  And we were pleased that Whedon didn't let a talent she'd after all shown she had simply surrender itself because before someone ostensibly way out of her countenancing; and I thought good for you Whedon for giving something pronounced to the more simply human characters -- with Captain America of course getting undaunted leadership, as well as emblemmanship of the times -- to help settle them in experientially amongst their powerhouse teammates as legitimate peers.  Hawkeye didn't get a standout trait; but they did make his arrows something sorta akin to Iron Man's arsenal.  And with him more or less the one exception, and with him being played by a movie star actor, and with us wanting one or two of the Avengers to be allowed to sulk a bit in the shadows -- good enough.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...