Skip to main content

Dorothy wrote (25 Dec. 2008)

Dorothy wrote (in reference to something I wrote):

"..the eat or be eaten "ethos" that was the only story the universe had to tell 'til that point."

- What point was that? This has changed?

Madoff/Enron/bcrail/Eron/etc.,etc.,etc.

Is there in fact more than one used planet in our cosmos already? I am sure we don't live on the same one.. Do enlighten me, someone..

And in response, I wrote:

Hi Dorothy. Happy holidays!

If you are human and are treated kindly / lovingly in your childhood -- the reptilian part of your brain not withstanding--you will be a wholly (possibly sic) loving "entity." Most progressives have received a fair bit of love in their childhood -- the "universe" they came to know at birth (and even before, in the womb) was often a very loving, fun place. They can be counted on to want others to experience the same, and to do enormous good. And, ultimately, as they are the most creative/playful and least demon-haunted/fearful people about, the future is with them (thank God).

So to your list, I counter: Jim Henson/the Tyee/Greenpeace/Obamanation/the low-key, peaceful, recycling generation/etc. etc. etc. And also centuries of gradually improving standards for the treatment of all living things, despite periods of terrible regress.

The development of homo sapien sapiens, a species which has the capacity to be and -- though in patches -- is becoming, an entirely loving species, and the universe they are in the process of remaking, is best evidence that the truest story of the universe now is a love story. ("A coming-of-age tale" would be a very distant second.) Before true empathy emerged, there was simply darkness, naught but a horror story.

Link: The Tyee

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch out, liberal extremities!

Watch out, liberal extremities! websmith says: “White people and an increasing number of minorities are tired of being called racists by the true racists and more appalled that this loony bleeding has spread from the heart to the brain." This is what many progressives are going to have to get used to hearing -- that THEY are the true racists! I've said this before but '60's liberalism goes down when enough people have decided that, in sum, it was never truly about what minorities, impoverished people wanted/needed, but instead what certain AFFLUENT WHITE PEOPLE wanted to believe those they ostensibly spoke for wanted/needed. They (progressives) will be made to seem, not the most caring, but the most negligent, most truly self-serving. Of course, most democrats in power will not be too afflicted by this, because they're ready to turn on the ’60s too. Why? Because, sad to say, they're getting in mood to want to see the weak and needy set-up as punishment-worthy a...

Conversation about Agulis at the Gene Wolfe Facebook Appreciation Club

James Pepe New Member  ·  20 hrs I’ve been rereading BotNS (this is my second read of it) and I just finished the part where Sev fights Agulis with the avern. I’m interested to hear what people think of the accusations Agilus levels agains Sevarian. Agilus says Sev has wronged him three times. Are we meant to take these accusations seriously? They're very strange. Is this just a last ditch attempt by Agilus to get out of being killed, or is Sev actually guilty of something, either legal, moral, or cultural. Are the powers that Agilus refers to simply that the avern didn’t kill Sev when it wounded him? Here the quote, “First by entrapment. You carried an heirloom worth a villa about the city without knowing what it was you had. As owner it was your duty to know, and your ignorance threatens to cost me my life tomorrow unless you free me tonight. Secondly, by refusing to entertain any offer to buy. In our commercial society, one may set...

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...