Skip to main content

Response to Shannon Rudd's "Beward of neuromarketing" (28 Dec. 2008)

My first thought is that this sort of article has me thinking of the popularity of “Dark Knight,” which suggests that for some reason we kind of want right now to imagine villains as master-minds, as all powerful (did you notice how many things just seemed to go the Joker's way, btw?), and kind of too readily "co-operate" with arguments made by those who would show just how hopeless things are right now.

It does sound like Buy-ology is one of those books written by someone who enjoys believing that the rest of us (not him, surely) are – despite our hope/belief that we are otherwise -- all too easily moved and controlled by those who know better than we do about how people work, and so doesn't really want to explore the considerable problem subliminal advertisers are faced with amongst a considerable some in our populace.

Namely: If somewhere deep down in our subconscious we don't want to "associate" with those who would use and abuse us, we won't do so (and there are prominent neuropsychiatrists -- who know that our subconsciouses are not as Freud argued, that is, essentially all the same, but vastly variant, depending on how well-nurtured we were as infants -- who'd back me up on this [Allan Schore comes to mind]). Sensed deep down there, we know when we're in the company of manipulators. And if you've been raised in a healthy family, in a healthy community, you'll recoil from (rather than be attracted to) manipulation, and spend much of your teenage/adult life (the influence of commercial culture, notwithstanding) associating with businesses that share your respect of others and the world. And there are many, many businesses out there that are like that. And many more ready to emerge.

(And second time in a row, Shannon, you've written an article where you begin by summoning forth mighty villains, and finish by concluding that resistance is futile. Are you helping set the scene so that when a true hero arrives, we'll cheer especially loudly?)

Link: The Tyee

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch out, liberal extremities!

Watch out, liberal extremities! websmith says: “White people and an increasing number of minorities are tired of being called racists by the true racists and more appalled that this loony bleeding has spread from the heart to the brain." This is what many progressives are going to have to get used to hearing -- that THEY are the true racists! I've said this before but '60's liberalism goes down when enough people have decided that, in sum, it was never truly about what minorities, impoverished people wanted/needed, but instead what certain AFFLUENT WHITE PEOPLE wanted to believe those they ostensibly spoke for wanted/needed. They (progressives) will be made to seem, not the most caring, but the most negligent, most truly self-serving. Of course, most democrats in power will not be too afflicted by this, because they're ready to turn on the ’60s too. Why? Because, sad to say, they're getting in mood to want to see the weak and needy set-up as punishment-worthy a...

Conversation about Agulis at the Gene Wolfe Facebook Appreciation Club

James Pepe New Member  ·  20 hrs I’ve been rereading BotNS (this is my second read of it) and I just finished the part where Sev fights Agulis with the avern. I’m interested to hear what people think of the accusations Agilus levels agains Sevarian. Agilus says Sev has wronged him three times. Are we meant to take these accusations seriously? They're very strange. Is this just a last ditch attempt by Agilus to get out of being killed, or is Sev actually guilty of something, either legal, moral, or cultural. Are the powers that Agilus refers to simply that the avern didn’t kill Sev when it wounded him? Here the quote, “First by entrapment. You carried an heirloom worth a villa about the city without knowing what it was you had. As owner it was your duty to know, and your ignorance threatens to cost me my life tomorrow unless you free me tonight. Secondly, by refusing to entertain any offer to buy. In our commercial society, one may set...

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...