Skip to main content

Artisan raping wands


In the comment sections of Randa Jarrar's essay, "Why I can't stand white belly dancers," commenter listtowardslight said:

As a world musician, I'm going to register my deep disapproval of this article.  If someone studies an art form deeply, gives credit where due, and gives it a thorough and deep treatment, they become a part of it.  They're communicating in ways greater than words.  It's nigh well a responsibility to continue the transmission.


How many videos of any Middle Eastern instrument played can you find without some argument breaking out in the comments - this is Persian!  No!  They ripped it off from the Kurds!  No!  The Armenians invented everything!  These jokers want to place national ownership on an instrument or a type of music.  Are they the ones playing, singing and dancing?  Hardly ever.

Does the author want to see if any Chinese are angry that the Japanese koto, the Korean gayageum, the Vietnamese danh tran, the Mongolian yatga all ripped off their ancient zither, the guzheng?  Was this not an organic proliferation?

The reality is that artists are driven by empathy and inspiration, and that's what the nationalists miss.  The nationalists have a deep underlying mistake in thinking *anything* in the world has a linear, neatly bounded growth rather than a unbounded, ongoing weave.  There is no single family tree to any long-standing art; cross-pollination is more the rule than the exception.  That's why, done rightly, it's effective connective tissue, effective antidote to oppression!

What about when it's done disrespectfully or wrongly?  Are there cheap, disrespectful knock-offs?  Yes.  They're outed as soon as something real shows up.  It's all a part of the conversation.

I'm talking about humanity's bards and artists doing what they *ought* to do.  Every pre-literate society passes on their stories through song, and often by dance; these things have deeper roots.  They are anthems to a deeper part of ourselves that goes deeper than social or national constructs, which we are better for listening to.

Art and song and dance slips boundaries and brings people into sync more readily than it sections them by nation, tribe, or race.  It is more powerful when kindling empathy than smothering it.  Compare any real cultural transmission to national anthems - what has more power?  Art is at its vital best when it's humanizing people, which powerfully counters corporate and national propaganda which would have us dehumanizing the Other so that war can be sold to the masses.

Yes, there is an issue with cultural appropriation.  It came from power differential and violent oppression, which are the creations of politicians, warlords, and bean-counters.  Not artists.

I'm going to close with a quote from a well-known poet, but the fact was that he wasn't just a poet.  Each line of his poetry was to be spoken in the midst of dance, during yet another time of notable cultural exchange and awful war.  His instruments were banned by religious fundamentalists and had to be smuggled as contraband, because those poems and that music and that dance were all a part of something they wanted to suppress.

* * *

I
Have
Learned
So much from God
That I can no longer
Call
Myself

A Christian, a Hindu, a Muslim,
A Buddhist, a Jew.

* * *

There's a reason we remember Hafez's unbounded spirit - here transmitted by Daniel Ladinksy - far better than anyone that tried to nail it down or set boundaries on its transmission.


Normally I think progressives would just agree with you, but right now, I'm not quite sure. 
For one, we're watching "True Detective," where the ones with deeper roots in the pre-literate Bayou, who's art and rituals have leaked through all the state's attempt at smothering, are rabid child-abusers. And the rope they use -- it's not for weaving but for tying kids down. And if we're admiring the anthropological mind of detective Rust, it's because it's going to help him snuff them out. 
Secondly, the European nations that attempted to kill pre-literate folk culture, replaced astrology with astronomy, magic with science -- and it's getting harder for us to champion any group that could think science an imposition. Normally we're all with you, because championing the traditionally picked on pisses off Republicans to no end, but it's becoming more important to champion science above all else. So the pre-literate cultures which enabled female empowerment and "commerce" with such things as their dance, art, and witchcraft, against a masculine state that wanted the multivalent tamed and unified -- but who were also against superstitions and for science, are going to get a more appreciative reappraisal from us.  
And you know, folk art may not contain a wit of empathy; it might not even be its core. The Venus figurines are considered amongst our first human art, and like what's at the bottom of "True Detective's" Bayou "sink," they may have been used mostly as child-raping wands. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Too late -- WE SAW your boobs

I think we're mostly familiar with ceremonies where we do anointing. Certainly, if we can imagine a context where humiliation would prove most devastating it'd probably be at a ceremony where someone thought themselves due an honor -- "Carrie," "Good Fellas." "We labored long to adore you, only so to prime your hope, your exposure … and then rather than a ladder up we descended the slops, and hoped, being smitten, you'd judged yourself worthless protoplasm -- a nothing, for letting yourselves hope you might actually be something -- due to be chuted into Hades or Hell." Ostensibly, nothing of the sort occurred during Oscars 2013, where the host, Seth Macfarlane, did a number featuring all the gorgeous Oscar-winning actresses in attendance who sometime in their careers went topless, and pointed this out to them. And it didn't -- not quite. Macarlane would claim that all obscenity would be directed back at him, for being the geek so pathetic …

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense of themse…

It might not have been worth it, Lupita

This is how Lupita Nhyong'o describes the shooting of the whipping scene in "12 Years a Slave":  And being there was more then enough to handle. "The reality of the day was that I was stripped naked in front of lots of people," Nyong'o said. "It was impossible to make that a closed set. In fact, I didn't even as for it to be a closed set, because at the end of the day, that was a privilege not granted to Patsey, you know? It really took me there. It was devastating to experiencing that, and to be tied to a post and whipped. Of course, I couldn't possible be really whipped. But just hearing the crack of that thing behind me, and having to react with my body, and with each whip, get weaker and weaker …" She grew quiet, and sighed. "I mean, it was -- I didn't practice it. It was just -- it was an exercise of imagination and surrender." Lupita was trying to become as close as she could to the actual Patsey, out of fidelity, apprec…