Skip to main content

Heroic progressives standing guard

@Signe_S  
When "customers sort out all of this" we will have THOUSANDS of businesses that discriminate and will be successful as was the case for HUNDREDS of years.
You just don't give a damn if minorities are discriminated against. Treating them like dogs is OK with you.
And any business that is open to the public should be compelled to comply with anti-discrimination (and anti-smoking) laws.
o
@nywriter You're being hysterical (not the funny kind). You are also presuming to know how I feel, which is illogical.
No, it's not OK with me if minorities are discriminated against, I would be the first one to boycott a business who did such a thing.
But the larger principle here is how much power do we give the government over individuals.
The problem is that people here are going with emotions over principle.
@Signe_S @nywriter  
No the larger principle is how do we allow racist scum to destroy the lives of millions of Americans by not letting them live in the neighborhoods they want to live in, go to the schools they want to go to, work in the jobs they are qualified to work in.
The USA is supposed to be about equality of opportunity -- unlike the authoritarian governments of the Old World that Americans fled from for centuries.
And you don't even understand government. Government is US. It is US. We utilize government to do things that WE want done as a group that we cannot do as individuals. Such as national security, law and order, and the like. I can't protect myself from terrorists. Or test the safety of the food I eat. Or make sure my air and water are clean.
Thus, WE delegate government to do those things that we cannot do.
Nor do you understand "private business." You're not smart enough to understand the difference between a business that is privately owned and a business that is private. Most businesses that are privately owned are PUBLIC, i.e. they serve the public and are open to the public.
Your lack of understanding of the principles this nation was founded on is morally revolting.
@nywriter  We utilize government to do things that WE want done as a group that we cannot do as individuals.
We can't often do them because it'd make us feel guilty to do so, personally responsible. But if we institutionalize the practice, it's in a different sphere, apart from us. Thus the army crushing women and children overseas has nothing to with our own personal need to see innocent women and children get hurt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…