Skip to main content

Brave enough to be truthful ...

Diannee Carden Glenn wrote:
A reporter called to interview me about my son’s death and my subsequent advocacy for overdose prevention. She asked the usual questions: How old was he when he died, when did he start to use, would Naloxone have saved his life. And then she asked a question no one had ever asked before. What is it like to lose a child to overdose?
I thought for a minute. On the surface, losing a child to overdose is no different than losing a child to disease, violence or an accident. I don’t think the loss itself is any more or less painful. The level of grief over losing a child is only linked to the immeasurable love you had for them in life.
When you lose a child, nothing is ever the same again. Parents are not supposed to outlive their children. Every facet of your life has a memory of your child. Every room in the house, every trip in the car, a song, a picture, a book, a walk in the park. There is a hole in your heart that will never be filled. You search and search for answers that just aren’t there. Holidays, birthdays are never the same.
You dial their phone number to tell them something and then it hits you that the phone is in your purse — but you still let it ring so that you can hear his voice: “Hello, this is Michael. I’m sorry I missed your call but leave a message and I’ll call you back.” You don’t know why you carry it and keep it charged, but it is comforting to know it is there. That message will be the only connection ever to what his voice sounded like.
You save his clothing unwashed in a plastic bag so that you can open it and still smell his smell lest you forget. You close your eyes, breathe deep and for just a minute he is there with you. You beg, you bargain, you plead to wake up and make it all not true. You find that tears are healing. You walk up the sidewalk from the car to the cemetery and put flowers and balloons and mementos on a plot of grass, because that is the place that has his name on it, the last place you saw the box that held his body.
You hear and smell and feel things that can’t possibly be there. And you talk – you talk to the dead.  You work on your religion, because you have to believe that there is a better place, another place where angels sing and there is no more pain. Losing a child is a pain like no other. It creeps up on you. You go to the grocery store and as you walk past a box of Cap’n Crunch cereal, tears begin to roll down your cheeks.  When you feel so much pain, it seems impossible that people can just pass by with their shopping carts, why they go on with their lives like nothing has happened. You wonder why they can’t tell that someone important is missing.
What is different about losing a child to overdose? Losing a child to addiction means you didn’t get to say goodbye, and you have to deal every day with the stigma of being a parent whose child died from drug use (if you are brave enough to be truthful about the cause of death). You question your every decision. You look for what you did wrong, what you didn’t say, why you didn’t have a second sense that something was wrong. You look back over the years, dissecting each part of their life – looking for clues. And you look at yourself and ask all of the what-ifs. You look for blame but mostly you blame yourself. You find an online group of mothers just like you, where there is no stigma and everyone has the same questions and feels the same pain with no judgment. You force yourself to read the coroner’s and toxicology report hoping there is an answer there. And you cry — a lot.
You look back and wonder if there was a time that you missed doing the right thing. Was it the time that he was bullied in the locker room, the time a neighbor ran over his skateboard ramp with his pickup because the noise from the skateboard bothered his hunting dogs, the time he won an award at school and you didn’t come because you had to work? Did you wait too long to leave your marriage?  Did you allow the dysfunction in your family to leave a place in his heart that would not heal but could only be numbed with a substance that would take his life?  When he called and asked you to come to New York to spend some time with him and you said you can’t come now but you will come in a month. Was that your missed opportunity?  If you had called him on Easter at 6 in the evening instead of 9 in the morning would it have made a difference in his decision to make the call that led to his relapse and death?
And then, some of us read. We read all the books about life after death and near-death experiences. We Google “overdose” and like a sponge we read articles about addiction. We read books and articles and news releases and Op-Eds. Is it a choice? Is it a brain disease? Is it a mental illness? Is it hereditary or environmental? We read about treatment and 12-step programs. 
[…]
She asked what it was like to lose a child to an overdose. And all I could tell her was, it is like this: When you lose a child to overdose, you may stand straight, but you will walk with a limp for the rest of your life. (Losing my son to drugs, Salon.com)
-----







The helplessness...the feeling of failure...for a parent, agony. For a mother, it must be brutal.






I am so sorry to hear about this happening to you and your family. As a previous heroin user to some extent, and more or less close to his age, your story weighs heavy on my heart for the mere possibility that I could have done this to my own parents. Please, do not blame yourself in any way, all kinds of people from different backgrounds pick up drug habits. There is no common denominator in most cases, no single factor that will determine whether an individual uses drugs.

Stay strong.






You brought me to tears. Your honesty is brutal, agonizing…and beautiful. I'm so sorry for your loss. I hope you can find some meaning in it someday. 





We are all struggling with hurt and some have huge pain. Let us be kinder to each other.





The 3 C's of Al-Anon: 
You didn't Cause it.
You can't Control it, &
You can't Cure it. 
Very very difficult to accept. But the rock bottom truth.






I wish I could hug you and repeat the line from Good Will Hunting over and over and over again.  "It's not your fault!"  May I also recommend watching the movie "Gravity".  Very inspiring movie about a woman overcoming the loss of a child.


Article about the economy (can you imagine) at Salon.com:
We lost the working class. I'm not sure how it happened. Was it inflation? deflation? jobs overseas? just bad luck? -- did it have something to do with me?: maybe I abandoned it, them, somehow? I'm not sure, but I'm obsessing over it, remembering all the joyous times when we were all together as a nation -- smiles over the space mission! -- as I stroll down destitute Detroit streets now, each view a recalled memory. 
-----
Commenter A: One thing's for sure, it's not your fault! Nothing to do with you! 
Moderator reply: I know, I know, but it still hurts. It was a nation all together as one.

Commenter B: It was a social phenomenon, couldn't be controlled and can't be cured! 
Moderator reply: That helps. I thank you. 

Commenter C: Your account brought me to tears! I too am sorry for the loss.  May we find meaning in it one day. 
Moderator reply: I'm dripping tears with you right now. We will overcome!
[all consoled, players exeunt stage right; Thomas Frank decides against following them, and switches to a different website.]








I am heartbroken by her loss, of course, but I don't understand people (most often social-values conservatives) who only seem to empathize with others when it is something that has impacted their own lives.  
I wonder if she ever asks herself whether her son might have come to her for help if he hadn't known how judgmental she was about others with drug issues.








@dsmat5 @furyhecla  
A lot of this -- her article -- would read the same by a certain kind of mother who's son had just, say, left home for college.
...
In a sense, there's now no chance her son will further evolve apart from her -- what adulthood invites upon the mother-son bond (Cap'n Crunch cereal?). Devoting her life now to overdose protection, there's a sense she's got her son perpetually before her again, with her perpetually at liberty to apply administrations. 
If he was alive, he'd be telling her to desist -- "my life is my own now, ma!" -- which is a tough thing for a mother to hear, especially those who required their children as extensions of themselves. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…