Skip to main content

Child-abuser eyes (12 December 2008)

quarry bay:

If Harper destroys everything of value, then he is doing exactly what the populace who voted for him, wants. Accumulated wealth makes people who received insufficient love from, who were treated sadistically by, their parents (with the nature of their relationship to the mother being of primary importance), feel extremely anxious: the reason for this is that unloved parents (mothers) need their children to give them the love they themselves did not receive from their own parents (mothers), and communicate in unforgettable ways to their children (through threats of violence, abandonment) that they are being very very bad children when they turn from their parents and start focusing on their own particular needs and wants (which begins to happen in a big way with adolescence, which is why there is often so much strain in child/parent relationships during this period). Accumulated societal wealth, for a society with a large number of insufficiently unloved constituents, makes people fear the visitation of some kind of horrific, catastrophic visitation, and this fear is in part abated when a leader arrives who helps find ways to get rid of all that anxiety-producing wealth. Spending on the military is usually the way immature societies do this; other ways include piling up bunches of blankets, and burning them (though this isn't done as much, these days).

Other ways of dealing with growth panic is to cling to a strong, patriarchal leader (it is the arousal of maternal anger, we fear, since differentiation is always from the mother, not the father) and support him as he sacrifices representatives of our growing, needing, "bad" selves, through wars -- economic or military.

If the coalition wins the day; if it proves relatively popular; it Canadians decide they really would prefer to not have an autocratic government and can handle a more anonymous and complex one; then what we know is that childhoods have been improving, and we have really been maturing, emotionally, as a nation.

But in my judgment, such a nation would never have voted in Harper -- with his child abuser eyes -- in the first place.

patrickmh

Link: The Tyee

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...