Skip to main content

Rhetorical persuasion and true love (24 February 2009)

Rocket999:

There's something about Dark Knight which leaves one thinking it's about getting the best from every particular scene rather than from the whole plot, which would seem to give real credence to your argument that there is little or no character development in the film. But there are many developments within conversations WITHIN these scenes, notably between Batman and the Joker, but with other characters as well, which has me thinking that the film, rather, is actually ALL ABOUT psychological movement and development. You experienced the movie as primarily about chasing, but the Joker isn't so much a dog chasing cars as he is the rhetoritician/politician/therapist set to make artful use of language and his subject's sensibilities, to draw them to see "just how pathetic they really are." He seeks to change people, and how, by appearances, such an outlandish, merciless, crazy, clown, set against the impossible, will actually manage (or come surprisingly close to managing) to win people (and you) over, is the question you get to ask in every scene he's in as you move along. And you watch, in fascination, as the Joker persuasively moves people who have set their will against him, through interesting back-and-forths, to ask questions of themselves, to doubt, to consider his point of view, to begin to think that maybe he isn't so crazy, after all.

Your characterization of the "love affair" between Wall-E and Eve as really that of a crush between 8 year olds, is bang-on enough to have me asking myself if it's the all of it. I would say no, because right now I find most relationships I see on T.V. and film rather guarded, and I would love it they could display the sort of vulnerable, enthusiastic, full commitment that Wall-E displays -- it would amount to a considerable evolution. This said, Wall-E immediately falls for someone who is all guarded up, who is ready to destroy anything which comes close to touching her. It's not necessarily typical of an 8 year old's crush, but there is some sickness, something wrong, something greatly undeveloped there, too. In sum: It's better than what many adults have, but it's not mature love, as you rightly argue.

Link: Oscar's Angst: It's fun for now (Salon)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Discussion over the fate of Jolenta, at the Gene Wolfe facebook appreciation site

Patrick McEvoy-Halston November 28 at 10:36 AM Why does Severian make almost no effort to develop sustained empathy for Jolenta -- no interest in her roots, what made her who she was -- even as she features so much in the first part of the narrative? Her fate at the end is one sustained gross happenstance after another... Severian has repeated sex with her while she lay half drugged, an act he argues later he imagines she wanted -- even as he admits it could appear to some, bald "rape" -- but which certainly followed his  discussion of her as someone whom he could hate so much it invited his desire to destroy her; Severian abandons her to Dr. Talus, who had threatened to kill her if she insisted on clinging to him; Baldanders robs her of her money; she's sucked at by blood bats, and, finally, left at death revealed discombobulated of all beauty... a hunk of junk, like that the Saltus citizens keep heaped away from their village for it ruining their preferred sense ...

Salon discussion of "Almost Famous" gang-rape scene

Patrick McEvoy-Halston: The "Almost Famous'" gang-rape scene? Isn't this the film that features the deflowering of a virgin -- out of boredom -- by a pack of predator-vixons, who otherwise thought so little of him they were quite willing to pee in his near vicinity? Maybe we'll come to conclude that "[t]he scene only works because people were stupid about [boy by girl] [. . .] rape at the time" (Amy Benfer). Sawmonkey: Lucky boy Pull that stick a few more inches out of your chute, Patrick. This was one of the best flicks of the decade. (sawmonkey, response to post, “Films of the decade: ‘Amost Famous’, R.J. Culter, Salon, 13 Dec. 2009) Patrick McEvoy-Halston: @sawmonkey It made an impression on me too. Great charm. Great friends. But it is one of the things you (or at least I) notice on the review, there is the SUGGESTION, with him being so (rightly) upset with the girls feeling so free to pee right before him, that sex with him is just further presump...

The Conjuring

The Conjuring 
I don't know if contemporary filmmakers are aware of it, but if they decide to set their films in the '70s, some of the affordments of that time are going to make them have to work harder to simply get a good scare from us. Who would you expect to have a more tenacious hold on that house, for example? The ghosts from Salem, or us from 2013, who've just been shown a New England home just a notch or two downscaled from being a Jeffersonian estate, that a single-income truck driver with some savings can afford? Seriously, though it's easy to credit that the father — Roger Perron—would get his family out of that house as fast as he could when trouble really stirs, we'd be more apt to still be wagering our losses—one dead dog, a wife accumulating bruises, some good scares to our kids—against what we might yet have full claim to. The losses will get their nursing—even the heavy traumas, maybe—if out of this we've still got a house—really,...