Skip to main content

Fab over flab: The Limbaugh romance may not last the night (4 March 2009)

And what about poor Michael Steele? He told Politico's Mike Allen that he'd been "inarticulate" and that he hadn't said what he really thought about Limbaugh. Do you need help remembering what Limbaugh said that was "ugly," Michael? How about the Chelsea Clinton "jokes," back when she was 13? What about visibly mocking Michael J. Fox for his Parkinson's tremors and insisting Fox was exaggerating his disease for political gain? Remember when Limbaugh complained, "We are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father was black, because this is the first black president." Is that "ugly" enough for you, Michael? Maybe you want to rethink your apology? Sadly, I doubt it. (Joan Walsh, March 4, 2009)

Joan, My own thoughts are that people always squirm before they finally capitulate and become part of a movement. Troopers beginning basic training not really wanting to be "[but-]bent[t] over forward, backward, whichever," to suit someone else's whims, either, but soon enough are eager-enough front-liners, pleased to have direction and target for their need to rape and kill.

I've thought Limbaugh would storehouse the Republican future, only to direct it onto Obama once Obama has lead the nation more fully into Afghan war and aggressive assault. But, you know, Limbaugh has a sensitive side -- your characterization of him as a bully is fair, but it is also true that he picks up on people's sensitivities, and you can even sense in him a need to suppress an instinct to reach out and care. Sounds crazy -- but I've seen it, I've felt it, and I wasn't surprised to hear he was a long-time Mac user: it tells you something, it really does. My guess is most Republicans have felt it too, and since they are intrinsically PC--i.e., those who fear warmth, affect, too much personality and friendliness, and who associate sensitivity too readily with feminine surrender and infantilization -- they will soon enough cast off their hold on Limbaugh's massive "girdle" and BY THEMSELVES invest/manifest in Obama's more evidently "gird[ed] [. . .] loins" (Joe Biden).

Link: Delay: Limbaugh's a GOP "role model" (Salon)


Popular posts from this blog

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …