Skip to main content

It's not going to matter: deflection will ace revelation (4 August 2009)


photo by Jonas Karlsson

It's not going to matter. This is period where the press assist Obama in demonstrating just what will happen to you if you raise a stir, where we get a sense of the kind of muscle that backs Obama, and I think Americans will get an erotic thrill from the devastating ruthlessness. It may in fact be what they "were looking for." The birthers, the doubters, the annoying pests will be eviscerated, and Obama's agenda will get back on track. And then when some complainers start taking on this agenda in the "wrong" way, they too can be shown refusing rides, talking to the wrong people, as having read the wrong books, said the wrong things: they too can be derided all Geraldine Ferraro out of the way. The truth of this is not going to matter. The land-of-birth thing strikes me as immensely silly. But it won't matter. Even if in our face, we won't see it--if it comes close to that, we'll just start taking a closer look at all that "you’ve" been up to.

Link: Salon's handy-dandy guide to refuting the birthers (Salon)


Popular posts from this blog

Full conversation about "Bringing Up Baby" at the NewYorker Movie Facebook Club

Richard Brody shared a link.Moderator · November 20 at 3:38pm I'm obsessed with Bringing Up Baby, which is on TCM at 6 PM (ET). It's the first film by Howard Hawks that I ever saw, and it opened up several universes to me, cinematic and otherwise. Here's the story. I was seventeen or eighteen; I had never heard of Hawks until I read Godard's enthusiastic mention of him in one of the early critical pieces in "Godard on Godard"—he called Hawks "the greatest American artist," and this piqued my curiosity. So, the next time I was in town (I… I was out of town at college for the most part), I went to see the first Hawks film playing in a revival house, which turned out to be "Bringing Up Baby." I certainly laughed a lot (and, at a few bits, uncontrollably), but that's not all there was to it. I had never read Freud, but I had heard of Freud, and when I saw "Bringing Up Baby," its realm of symbolism made instant sense; it was obviou…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …