Skip to main content

Walsh/O'Reilly debate (18 June 2009)

fox

fox news

Moderator: "Before we begin the debate, do we agree that you both believe the other to have blood on their hands, that is, to be responsible for murder, and so rightly should be jailed if not recipient of more just deserts, kept away from humanity, forcibly and forever, and most certainly not debated with?"

And the debate wasn't civil. Must have been all O'Reilly's fault.

- - - - -

Further:

Dr. Paul McHugh very much sounds like a dangerous human being devoted to defending perpetrators and causing further pain to victims, but the Sotomayor debate primed many of us to once again see credentials as everything. Sotomayor was first in her class at Princeton, so, Right, shut the hell up. Dr. Paul McHugh was some big-wig at John Hopkins University, so Left, shut the hell up. Paul McHugh could have been first in his class at Princeton and be otherwise massively credentialed, and we still need to be amidst an environment where the very fact that he works to advance the idea of false memory syndrome and thereby disenfranchise the abused, can work to shut him down. The way it is, if the Right is smart, they'll work with universities supported by corporate interests (that is, every university) to ensure "their own" are the ones who tend to get tenure. Turn all the lefties into indepedent scholars or travelling TAs, and you won't have to listen to them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Superimposing another "fourth-wall" Deadpool

I'd like to superimpose the fourth-wall breaking Deadpool that I'd like to have seen in the movie. In my version, he'd break out of the action at some point to discuss with us the following:
1) He'd point out that all the trouble the movie goes to to ensure that the lead actress is never seen completely naked—no nipples shown—in this R-rated movie was done so that later when we suddenly see enough strippers' completely bared breasts that we feel that someone was making up for lost time, we feel that a special, strenuous effort has been made to keep her from a certain fate—one the R-rating would even seemed to have called for, necessitated, even, to properly feed the audience expecting something extra for the movie being more dependent on their ticket purchases. That is, protecting the lead actress was done to legitimize thinking of those left casually unprotected as different kinds of women—not as worthy, not as human.   


2) When Wade/Deadpool and Vanessa are excha…

"The Zookeeper's Wife" as historical romance

A Polish zoologist and his wife maintain a zoo which is utopia, realized. The people who work there are blissfully satisfied and happy. The caged animals aren't distraught but rather, very satisfied. These animals have been very well attended to, and have developed so healthily for it that they almost seem proud to display what is distinctively excellent about them for viewers to enjoy. But there is a shadow coming--Nazis! The Nazis literally blow apart much of this happy configuration. Many of the animals die. But the zookeeper's wife is a prize any Nazi officer would covet, and the Nazi's chief zoologist is interested in claiming her for his own. So if there can be some pretence that would allow for her and her husband to keep their zoo in piece rather than be destroyed for war supplies, he's willing to concede it.

The zookeeper and his wife want to try and use their zoo to house as many Jews as they can. They approach the stately quarters of Hitler's zoologist …

"Life" as political analogy, coming to you via Breitbart News

Immediately after seeing the film, I worked over whether or not the movie works as something the alt-right would produce to alienate us from the left. Mostly the film does work this way  -- as a sort of, de facto, Breitbart production -- I decided, though it's not entirely slam-dunk. There is no disparagement evident for the crew of the space station being a multicultural mix, for instance. Race is not invisible in the film; it feels conspicuous at times, like when the Japanese crew member is shown looking at his black wife on video conference; but the film maker, wherever he was actually raised, seems like someone who was a longtime habitat of a multicultural milieu, some place like London, and likes things that way. But the film cannot convince only as macabre relating to our current fascination with the possibility of life on Mars -- what it no doubt pretends to be doing -- because the idea of “threat” does not permeate this interest at all, whereas it absolutely saturates our …